![the year one challenge for women review the year one challenge for women review](https://lirp.cdn-website.com/358ffdf6/dms3rep/multi/opt/1901699_712353258796428_1604163980_n-0fba8ad3-960w.jpg)
6, federal Judge Robert Pittman issued a temporary injunction barring Texas state judges and clerks from accepting the suits authorized under the law, known as S.B.
![the year one challenge for women review the year one challenge for women review](https://i.etsystatic.com/16852170/r/il/cf15ea/2141041282/il_570xN.2141041282_26dp.jpg)
National A Louisiana clinic struggles to absorb the surge created by Texas' new abortion law It argued that the state law violates the equal protection guarantee of the Fourteenth Amendment and that it violates the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution, which prohibits states from interfering with the federal government's exercise of its constitutional powers. With abortions all but shut down in Texas and providers having failed to block the law, federal government went to court with a new challenge. "The statutory scheme before the court is not only unusual but unprecedented," Roberts wrote back then, noting that the "consequence appears to be to insulate the state from responsibility for implementing and enforcing the regulatory regime." The vote was 5-to-4, with Chief Justice John Roberts and the court's three liberals in dissent. In early September, the high court allowed the law to go into effect, turning away the challenge brought by clinics, doctors and patients who sought to block the law while its merits were litigated in the lower courts.
![the year one challenge for women review the year one challenge for women review](https://ecdn.teacherspayteachers.com/thumbitem/End-of-the-Year-Review-ESCAPE-ROOM-for-Reading-Informational-Text-7th-Grade-4518524-1564933694/original-4518524-1.jpg)
National What The Texas Abortion Ban Does - And What It Means For Other States Timeline of legal challenges up to this point "These women will suffer personal harm from delaying their medical care, and as their pregnancies progress, they may even be unable to obtain abortion care altogether." "The promise of future adjudication offers cold comfort, however, for Texas women seeking abortion care, who are entitled to relief now," she wrote. Justice Sonia Sotomayor dissented with keeping the law in place. What Sotomayor said in her partial dissent